APPLICATION OF BUCKLEY-JAMES METHOD AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO COX MODEL IN VIOLATION OF PROPORTIONAL RISK ASSUMPTION
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Buckley-James’ method (BJ) has no assumptions about the error distribution of the linear regression model. That model can be an alternative to semi-parametric Cox model, when the proportional hazard assumption is not satisfied. For instance, consider the patients’ lifetime after a surgical procedure for treating the esophageal variances from a progressive complication of cirrhosis. The lifetimes were observed to death during follow-up of 94 patients. Therefore, patients have not died until the ending of the follow-up were considered as censorship. The patients covariates as degree cirrhosis (Child-Pugh = 1, 2 or 3), use of blocker medication and patient age were studied to evaluate their effects in the survival time model. As those covariates presented no proportional hazards, so the Cox model could not be adjusted. In that case, the Buckley-James linear regression model can be useful to analyze data censored lifetimes. The covariate p values of age = Child 1, Child = 2 and 1 = _-blocker were respectively equal to 0.051; 0.002; 0.056 and 0.023. The BJ model is an extension of the classic linear models for censored data and it has good statistical properties under certain conditions of regularity.
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).