AVALIAÇÃO DO MÉTODO DE PRODAN NA AMOSTRAGEM DE CERRADO SENSU STRICTO NO DISTRITO FEDERAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate and compare the sampling methods of Prodan and Fixed Area (plots) in Cerrado sensu stricto in the Distrito Federal, Brazil. For the Fixed Area method, 10 plots of 20 × 50 m were randomly distributed in the study area. In the center of each fixed area plot, points were marked for sampling by the Prodan method. In each sample unit, the trees were identified and the diameter at the base (Db ≥ 5 cm) and total height were measured. By Prodan method were sampled 39.1% of plant species and 60.7% of the botanical families that were sampled by the Fixed Area method. The plant species sampled by Prodan method were, mostly, those with higher relative values of frequency, density and dominance obtained in the Fixed Area method. The number of trees, basal area and volume per hectare did not differ between the two methods. Although the Prodan method obtain smaller samples in number of botanical species and families, it gets samples of the most representative species of phytosociology. The Prodan method is as efficient as the Fixed Area method for estimating tree numbers, basal area, and volume per hectare.
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).