SEMELHANÇAS E DISCORDÂNCIAS ENTRE MÉTODOS DE ADAPTABILIDADE E ESTABILIDADE

Main Article Content

Laís Mayara Azevedo BARROSO
Moysés NASCIMENTO
Ana Carolina Campana NASCIMENTO
Fabyano Fonseca e SILVA
Reinaldo de Paula FERREIRA
Cosme Damião CRUZ
Filipe Ribeiro Formiga TEIXEIRA
Paulo Eduardo TEODORO

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of discrepant points on the classification of genotypes obtained through methods of adaptability and stability that are different from the statistical concepts used in its construction (Eberhart and Russell, nonparametric regression, expanded centroid and Lin and Binns). For this, it was used data from an experiment on dry matter yield of 92 genotypes of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) evaluated in 20 environments. The results indicated that the presence of discrepant points changed the classification of genotypes in all tested methodologies. Among all methodologies evaluated, the extended centroid method showed less sensitivity to the presence of outliers.

Article Details

How to Cite
BARROSO, L. M. A., NASCIMENTO, M., NASCIMENTO, A. C. C., SILVA, F. F. e, FERREIRA, R. de P., CRUZ, C. D., TEIXEIRA, F. R. F., & TEODORO, P. E. (2017). SEMELHANÇAS E DISCORDÂNCIAS ENTRE MÉTODOS DE ADAPTABILIDADE E ESTABILIDADE. Brazilian Journal of Biometrics, 35(3), 634–644. Retrieved from https://biometria.ufla.br/index.php/BBJ/article/view/50
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>